11SP30 vs 81F
	



SPRI76.DSK;1           1709
Spring 1976

SPRI78.DSK;1           2660
Spring 1978

FALL78.DSK;1           2018
Fall 1978 San Francisco

SPRI79.DSK;1           1277
Spring 1979 New Orleans

FALL79.DSK;1           5539
Fall 1979 San Diego

11SP13.DSK;1           3384
Spring 1980 Chicago

11SP17.DSK;1           4541
Fall 1980 San Diego

11SP26.DSK;1           6130
81S.DSK;1              6182/6185     8-JUL-1990 00:00:00.00
Spring 1981 Miami

11SP30.DSK;1           5356
81F.DSK;1             11113/11115    8-JUL-1990 00:00:00.00
Fall 1981 Los Angeles
11SP30 vs 81F:
	11SP30 has some "shrunk-to-size" disk images, which is good,
as the wastage on 81F can be very large.  But 81F looks more original.
But 11SP30 has some SFGL70.DEV.  Who knows?

11SP32.DSK;1           4663
82S.DSK;1              8087/8090     8-JUL-1990 00:00:00.00
Spring 1982 Atlanta
11SP32 vs 82S:
	Again, 11SP32 has some "shrunk to size" disk images.
But 82S looks more original.  ???

11SP48.DSK;1           2397
82F.DSK;2              4120/4120     8-JUL-1990 00:00:00.00
Fall 1982 Anaheim
	Again, 11SP48 has been "shrunk to size".  It looks like
it has everything in the original.

11SP53.DSK;1           6494
83S.DSK;1              9143/9145     8-JUL-1990 00:00:00.00
Spring 1983 St. Louis
	Again 11SP53 has been "shrunk".  Otherwise it looks like
everything is there.

11SP59.DSK;1          19053
83F.DSK;1             19378/19380    8-JUL-1990 00:00:00.00
Fall 1983 Las Vegas
	Many (but not all?) logical disks have been "shrunk" in 11SP59.

11SP66.DSK;1          19828
Spring 1984 Cincinnati

11SP68.DSK;1          14012
DECUS C distribution

11S076.DSK;1          17886
84F.DSK;1             18443/18445    8-JUL-1990 00:00:00.00
Fall 1984 Anaheim
Again, some shrinking/combining has been done on 11S076.

11S083.DSK;1          17796
Spring 1985 New Orleans

11S087.DSK;1          18106
Fall 1985 Anaheim

11S091.DSK;1          24956
Spring 1986 Dallas

11S094.DSK;1          24654
86F.DSK;1             24712/24715    8-JUL-1990 00:00:00.00
Fall 1986 San Francisco
11S094 vs 86F
	UCL.MAC in UCLPL2.DSK is slightly different
	One in 86F is more complete, and preferred

11S097.DSK;1          20425
87S.DSK;1             20489/20490    8-JUL-1990 00:00:00.00
Spring 1987 Nashville
11S097 vs 87S
	TAPDIR.TXT slightly different.
	MAIL.LOG in MAILUT.DSK slightly different.
	No reason to prefer one over the other


11S103.DSK;1          11811
88S.DSK;1             11927/11930    8-JUL-1990 00:00:00.00
Spring 1988 Cincinnati
11S103 vs 88S
	KERMC1.DSK and KERMC2.DSK are different, but only due to
	11S103's version being more compact.  11S103 is preferred.

11S108.DSK;1           8342
1988 Australia

11S109.DSK;1          24501
Best of RT Spring 1989

11S113.DSK;1           6389
Fall 1990